![]() |
|
Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Printable Version +- Panthersfanz Forums (https://panthersfanz.com/board) +-- Forum: Carolina Panthers Fanz Forum (https://panthersfanz.com/board/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Carolina Panthers Talk (https://panthersfanz.com/board/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey (/showthread.php?tid=1855) |
Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Ladypanther - 02-26-2025 https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article301028429.html The NFL Players Association’s annual survey was released on Wednesday, and the results showed the Carolina Panthers still have many areas for organizational improvement. The Panthers earned the 25th overall ranking out of 32 NFL teams, according to the survey. That was a drop of eight spots from a year prior. The survey cited “a lack of space in the facility, declining travel conditions and the continued use of turf over grass” as the primary reasons why the organization earned such a low grade in the eyes of its players. Similar to last year, too, David Tepper also earned an underwhelming mark. The Panthers earned a D- grade in “ownership” — 31st out of 32 teams. Tepper ranked only ahead of the New York Jets’ Woody Johnson. Per the survey overview: “The need for renovations and the continued use of turf instead of grass, perhaps because it is cheaper to maintain, continue to be drivers owner David Tepper’s low grade.” The NFLPA survey began in 2023 as a way for the NFLPA to further advocate for their membership: to push for better field surfaces and standardized safety protocols and more. It’s also a roadmap for free agents — both to highlight positive clubs, to identify clubs that need improvement and highlight best practices and standards. Only 35 players took the NFLPA survey in Carolina. That ranks among the bottom-five in participation across the league, NFLPA representatives said in a meeting explaining the results on Wednesday. The team with the most survey participation was the New York Giants with 68 players. The survey was administered from Aug. 26 to Nov. 20. Tepper Sports and Entertainment announced last year robust plans to renovate Bank of America Stadium. Those plans included the construction of an indoor practice facility in uptown, something that veteran Adam Thielen said is overdue. Another low mark came in “team travel,” where the Panthers earned a “D” grade. The survey cites that fewer players feel they had a comfortable amount of personal space on team flights this year “because coaches moved into first class seats, leaving players with smaller seats.” The organization earned top-10 distinctions in its treatment of families, its nutritionist and its training staff. According to the survey, 79% of the players reported that they get an individualized nutrition plan and that the team dietitian is “very accessible.” Kate Callaway is the director of performance of nutrition, and Tim Rabas is the performance nutrition assistant, according to the team website. The survey also says the team frequently organizes family events and provides a daycare and a family room during home games, bumping up the family score. As for the training staff: 89% of Panthers players report that they receive enough one-on-one treatment, and that the training staff moderately contributes to their overall success. The team hired former Bills associate athletic trainer Denny Kellington as the new vice president of player health and performance earlier this month. Kellington replaced former head athletic trainer Kevin King and former director of health, performance and innovation Andrew Althoff, who were let go during the offseason. Panthers’ NFLPA grades in 2025 Treatment of families: B+, 7th Food / dining area: B, 18th Nutritionist / dietitian: A-, 8th Locker room: C, 20th Training room: B-, 18th Training staff: B+, 7th Weight room: C+, 27th Strength coaches: A, 8th Team travel: D, 29th Head coach: A-, 17th Ownership: D-, 31st RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Hobbit99 - 02-27-2025 I stumbled on to an expanded version of this -- direct from the NFLPA. The information in the Observer article was accurate, no doubt. However, it does not tell the whole story. The Panthers did fall down the rankings some, also, no doubt. However, what I found just as interesting (maybe more so..) was HOW the NFLPA arrives at the numerical scores, as well as WHAT were the apparent "measurables" that drove the rankings. It's very interesting to read some of the summaries from the Panthers as well as some of the other teams. SO... For those who are interested, here are some links to the NFLPA's Report Card, some of the underlying tenets, and the complete list of the teams and how they ranked in each category. NFLPA: Reasoning and Techniques, Vision and Perspective Behind the Report Cards NFLPA: 32 NFL Teams Total Report Cards and Overall Scores ***(This is a look at Overall numbers for all teams. You can click on each team to see breakouts in different categories. At the bottom of the page, there is a grade scale, a 'weighted' scale, and a section of comments and 'disclaimers' about the gathering of information and reliability of data points...) NFLPA: Carolina Panthers - Report Card With Individual Categories This is the breakout for the Panthers. Categories are listed down the left side of the page. Clicking on a category will open the comment section for your reading pleasure..!! *** WOW -- The Arizona Cardinals really sucked in lots of categories.!! ---- AND ---- The Atlanta Falcons blew the top off of most of the categories.!! *** ALSO --- I don't understand the reasoning behind the "weighted scale" percentages.??? Exactly HOW an owner directly affects a player (generally speaking). The single highest weight was given to "ownership". Other areas, with more direct "impact" were weighted lower and in some cases, MUCH lower (Families; Nutritionists were at the very bottom of the weighted scale.??) --- I think the NFLPA is out of touch.!!
RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Hobbit99 - 02-27-2025 I expect that the results from the NFLPA will ruffle a LOT of feathers. Here is an early response from MSN about the Bills and how Brandon Beane reacted to the survey (NOT GOOD...). There are some interesting tidbits in here... Quote:MSN Just a bunch of politics..??? Or is there something else here.??? The NFLPA, although they would have you believe otherwise, is still just another way of saying "union". They have ONE priority and that is recruiting 'members' and making money for their Board (Okay - TWO priorities..). A bunch of what they say and do is just a lot of "sour grapes." IMHO, of course -- IMHO. RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Ladypanther - 02-27-2025 Good info on the survey Hobs. Everything kind of equally weighted with a few exceptions. Most 9 %........nutrition only 6%???. Seems like it is very important, IMO. Head coach 10 % but look at the owner...a whopping 15%. Well...we are forever screwed. This weighted thing is hard. You would think the HC would be a bit more important. But anyway...thanks for the info and the link. Union? Don't mind it. These insanely rich white men need some oversight. Otherwise...they would just care about getting richer and not worry about who gets screwed in the process,
RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - PantherFan007 - 03-01-2025 Very interesting information and I don't doubt much of it. But, at the same time, I have to ask myself, is this rating because the team has sucked so bad the past several years, and would it have been higher had the team made the playoffs during that same time? RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - Ladypanther - 03-01-2025 (03-01-2025, 09:59 AM)PantherFan007 Wrote: Very interesting information and I don't doubt much of it. But, at the same time, I have to ask myself, is this rating because the team has sucked so bad the past several years, and would it have been higher had the team made the playoffs during that same time? It is not supposed to have anything to do about wins and losses. It is not just a coincidence that bad owners have teams with bad records. RE: Panthers do not fare well in annual NFLPA survey - PantherFan007 - 03-07-2025 (03-01-2025, 10:34 AM)Ladypanther Wrote:(03-01-2025, 09:59 AM)PantherFan007 Wrote: Very interesting information and I don't doubt much of it. But, at the same time, I have to ask myself, is this rating because the team has sucked so bad the past several years, and would it have been higher had the team made the playoffs during that same time? I do wish they would put grass back on the field and get rid of that astro-turf. And send D-Tep packing, too!
|