01-29-2023, 02:37 PM -
Hilarious... First..
After I looked it up, I noticed a list of "Notable Illumni" that included 18 players names and another list of 10 game MVPs.........NONE of which I am familiar with. Anyway..... No big name players for certain.
It just seems oddly surprising that the NFLPA would lend their name (or "sponsor") a "Bowl" game to feature players who are NOT expected to be drafted. Why bother..?? It's not like it would be a good, or exciting, or even interesting game. There are (apparently..) 43 actual "bowl games" featuring TEAMS playing against each other in 2022--2023. Why add another mish-mash mess (not really a 'game'..).??? Sort of like a 'Junior' "Senior Bowl"....????
Sorry.... I just don't "get it".
As far as the 'experts' having any semblance of 'smartness'....??? I think your statement is probably correct.
After I looked it up, I noticed a list of "Notable Illumni" that included 18 players names and another list of 10 game MVPs.........NONE of which I am familiar with. Anyway..... No big name players for certain.
It just seems oddly surprising that the NFLPA would lend their name (or "sponsor") a "Bowl" game to feature players who are NOT expected to be drafted. Why bother..?? It's not like it would be a good, or exciting, or even interesting game. There are (apparently..) 43 actual "bowl games" featuring TEAMS playing against each other in 2022--2023. Why add another mish-mash mess (not really a 'game'..).??? Sort of like a 'Junior' "Senior Bowl"....????
Sorry.... I just don't "get it".
As far as the 'experts' having any semblance of 'smartness'....??? I think your statement is probably correct.